They  Got Charles Darwin Trapped Out there on Highway 5

In Bob Dylan’s High Water (For Charley Patton) which was released on "Love And Theft" on Oct 19, 2001 there is a remarkable lyric that few have really taken notice of.   Let me quote here, in context, to get it out in front of us:

"Well, George Lewis told the Englishman, the Italian and the Jew

You can't open your mind, boys To every conceivable point of view.

They got Charles Darwin trapped out there on Highway Five

 Judge says to the High Sheriff,
 "I want him dead or alive
 Either one, I don't care."
High Water everywhere."

George Lewis and Charles Darwin are some old bluesmen from the south right?  Friends of Blind Lemon Jefferson, Charley Patton or something like that right?   No, I don’t think that is the reference.   He can’t be talking about Charles Darwin the English Naturalist, can he?  I mean this seems to be sort of a negative reference.  Having him trapped out there on the highway like O. J. Simpson when he made his great escape on Highway 405, and wanted “dead or alive” and all.   That is how we might talk about Billy the Kid or his outlaw sidekick Alias, but certainly not the distinguished naturalist.

Dylan is not challenging the established orthodoxy of the university and the scientific culture of the Western World is he?  I mean if there is one thing that can’t be challenged in polite society in the twenty first century it is Darwin’s theory of Natural Selection.  Hopefully Dylan hasn’t become so “born again” that he is questioning this, the unquestionable verity.  I mean Neo-Darwinian evolution is accepted at every level, from the grade school, to the high school, in the university, graduates schools, to institutions of research to the Smithsonian.  Come on Doug, you are not about to suggest that Dylan would be willing to question this overwhelming consensus are you?  To question this is to question the cultures’ overriding understanding of reality, he couldn’t, he wouldn’t go there, .... would he?

Dylan understands the larger implications of this scientific theory, the larger worldview implications that arise from it.  Every worldview must answer the question, What is the thing or the process from which everything else comes?  A materialist or naturalistic worldview answers that question with reference to matter and energy and strictly material processes.   So Darwin’s theory provides a critical plank in this larger materialistic narrative or theory of being.   Is Dylan, with just a couple of lines of a song, trying to undermine the very foundation of this very comprehensive and strictly materialistic view of reality?  In a word  …. Yes, He is.  He claims this theory has a limited future:

Oh it’s rush hour now
On the wheel and the plow
And the sun is going down
Upon the sacred cow

Dylan has been critical before of this type of thinking in his song License to Kill of those who would come to a place where “all they believe is their eyes, and their eyes just tell them lies.”  These are people who have "had their brains mismanaged with great skill." 
There is so much more going on in the world than simply what can be seen with our eyes.   We can’t even see the wind, only its effects, but we don’t need a weather man to know which way the wind blows.

The artist has been concerned with this issue for a long time.  Forty three years ago on the New Morning Album from 1970 there was the interesting song called Three Angels.  The artist is sitting on the sidewalk observing things near 10^th Avenue, [Manhattan] and he is noticing everybody failing to ask basic questions….

One U-Haul trailer, a truck with no wheels
The Tenth Avenue bus going west
The dogs and pigeons fly up and they flutter around
A man with a badge skips by
Three fellas crawlin’ on their way back to work
Nobody stops to ask why…

And as a result they are missing out on something real going on in the unseen world, the world beyond.

The angels play on their horns all day
The whole earth in progression seems to pass by
But does anyone hear the music they play
Does anyone even try?

These are great questions by a sensitive seeker of truth “In this concrete world full of souls”  who is hearing the music played by the three angels that is drowned out by the whole earth passing by in progression, totally oblivious to what he is hearing.

There is a bio-ethicist at Princeton, Peter Singer who is an advocate of the radical animal rights agenda and the denial of any qualitative difference between animals and man.  He says we are just catching up with Darwin and anyone who puts any kind of distinction between “us and them” is not following the theory consistently.  It follows from that to assert anything like humandignity simply has no ground on which to stand.  To stand up for human dignity is just a form of “specism.”   So this naturalistic way of thinking has a way of bleeding into our understanding of other disciplines, sociology, political science, jurisprudence.

 

 

 

 

looking into every masterpiece of literature
For dignity

So many roads, so much at stake
So many dead ends, I’m at the edge of the lake
Sometimes I wonder what it’s gonna take
To find dignity
For Singer, to stand up for human dignity is just a form of “specism.”   So this naturalistic way of thinking has a way of bleeding into our understanding of other disciplines, sociology, political science, ethics and jurisprudence.

And Dylan reminds us of where this way of thinking is headed in his conclusion to his great song Ring them Bells,

Oh the lines are long
And the fighting is strong
And they’re breaking down the distance
Between right and wrong
So getting back to High Water (For Charley Patton)

 "You can't open your mind, boys
 To every conceivable point of view."

You have to find some place solid on which to stand.   Maybe it should be on the “Solid Rock, made, before… the foundation ....of ....the World.”

 Doug